XHTML is Dead

Monday, March 14th, 2005

XHTML is Dead - “Today I have to admit that I was wrong. XHTML 1 is dead. Lost. Beyond all salvation.”

Both comments and pings are currently closed.

5 Responses to “XHTML is Dead”

  1. Aaron Egaas Says...
    On March 14th, 2005 at 7:36 pm #

    It should be noted that XHTML as a paradigm is alive and kicking. Validate your code, kiddies.

  2. Ryan Says...
    On March 14th, 2005 at 8:26 pm #

    Yeah, I think that XHTML is good for markup, but reading this doesn’t really make me think otherwise. Cleaner markup just makes it easier IMO.

  3. ca Says...
    On March 14th, 2005 at 8:41 pm #

    Cleaner code/script/markup good. Yeah, all of my handcoded pages I mark up as XHTML - well, kinda. I always forget the DOCTYPE declaration!! That’s why the creator made DreamWeaver, I suppose.

  4. david’s blog » Blog Archive » The Elements of Meaningful XHTML Says...
    On March 14th, 2005 at 10:19 pm #

    [...] HTML in my futile “anti-ryan” efforts, i decided to attack links to XHTML is Dead. and i magically found this link to The Elements of Meaningful XHTML. [...]

  5. Dan Says...
    On March 15th, 2005 at 4:37 pm #

    This article is stupid. If you used his rationale, there are a lot of “dead things” in the world. If you ask me, HTML has been dead ever since FrontPage came out (using his logic).